S. Peer et al., Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography, EUR RADIOL, 9(8), 1999, pp. 1693-1696
The aim of this study was comparative analysis of rejected radiographs in c
onventional and digital radiology under the aspects number of rejected imag
es ages and reasons for rejection. During 2 months waste films of conventio
nal radiography were collected in digital radiography each image-delete com
mand at the postprocessing workstation was documented. Rejected images were
analysed and assigned to four categories. The overall reject rate was 27.6
% in the conventional and 2.3 % in the digital department. Whereas in the
conventional department the main reason for rejection was ''exposure'' and
"others" (i.e. problems related to film handling), the main reason in the d
igital environment was "positioning". The high exposure tolerance of digita
l systems markedly reduces the amount of faulty images. This is not only ec
onomically rewarding, but may also reduce unnecessary X-ray exposure of pat
ients due to image retake.