I. Majolino et al., Autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: a GITMO retrospective analysis on 290 patients, HAEMATOLOG, 84(9), 1999, pp. 844-852
Background and Objective. Autologous transplantation is a better treatment
for multiple myeloma (MM) than chemotherapy, but uncertainty remains about
patient selection, optimal timing of autograft, conditioning regimen, need
for a second autograft, and role of maintenance. To provide partial answers
to these questions we assessed the results of autologous transplantation i
n a large cohort of patients whose data were reported to the GITMO registry
.
Design and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed data from 290 patients with
MM (M=150; F=140; median age 52 years, range 19-70; stage I=34, stage II=7
5, stage III=167) reported to the GITMO. At the time of autograft, 20% were
in CR, 66% in PR, while the remaining had non-responsive or progressive di
sease. Median time between diagnosis and transplant was 16 months (1-90). S
eventy-two patients (26%) had been planned to receive a double autograft, b
ut this was actually done in only 35 (12%) The conditioning was chemotherap
y in 90%. Peripheral blood was the only source of stem cells in 94%, and pu
rging was applied in 10% of cases. For statistical analysis of data, differ
ences between patient subsets were analyzed using the chi-square test, whil
e the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate event-free survival (EFS) an
d survival (OS) probabilities. The Cox model was used for multivariate anal
ysis.
Results. Following the autograft, 116 patients (40%) were in CR, 144 (50%)
in PR, 24 (8%) did not respond or progressed and 6 (2%) died before respons
e evaluation. Transplant-related mortality occurred in 3%. At a median foll
ow-up of 23 months, 223 (77%) patients are alive, 71 (24%) of them in CR, a
nd 67 (23%) patients have died at a median time of 20 months (0-70). OS and
EFS at 6 years are 47% and 28%, respectively, but the EFS curve shows no p
lateau. In multivariate analysis, age, beta(2)-microglobulin level and stat
us at transplant emerged as significant prognostic factors for both OS and
EFS, while time from diagnosis to transplant showed borderline significance
.
Interpretation and Conclusions. Based on the prognostic factors Identified
In multivariate analysis, we were able to assess the weight of a single pro
gnostic factor or their combinations an transplant outcome. We also calcula
ted the probability of OS and EFS by the number of factors at the time of a
utograft. Autologous transplantation is a safe and effective procedure, not
only In sensitive patients, but also in resistant cases, provided they are
<55 years of age and have low beta(2)-microglobulin, it should be applied
early the diagnosis of multiple myeloma, following the delivery of brief pr
imary chemotherapy. (C) 1999, Ferrata Storti Foundation.