Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test: A comparison of the CVI, T, (rWG(J)), and r*(WG(J)) indexes

Citation
Mk. Lindell et Cj. Brandt, Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test: A comparison of the CVI, T, (rWG(J)), and r*(WG(J)) indexes, J APPL PSYC, 84(4), 1999, pp. 640-647
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00219010 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
640 - 647
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9010(199908)84:4<640:AIAOTJ>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
This article examines the problem of estimating interrater agreement about the job relevance of test items by examining 4 different indexes: C. H. Law she's (1975) Content Validity Index (CVI); H. E. A. Tinsley and D. J. Weiss 's (1975) T; L. R. James, R. G. Demaree, and G. Wolf's (1984) r(WG(J)); and M. K. Lindell, C. J. Brandt, and D. J. Whitney's (1999) r*(WG(J)). These 4 indexes are shown to be systematically related to each other, but r*(WG(J) ) is computationally simpler and is more generally applicable than the othe r indexes.