Waste gas monitor reduces wasted volatile anesthetic

Citation
Ty. Euliano et al., Waste gas monitor reduces wasted volatile anesthetic, J CLIN M C, 15(5), 1999, pp. 287-293
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING
ISSN journal
13871307 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
287 - 293
Database
ISI
SICI code
1387-1307(199907)15:5<287:WGMRWV>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objective. The increasing focus on health care costs requires that all phys icians evaluate practice behaviors. The primary emphasis in anesthesia has been limiting the use of expensive medications and interventions. Reducing waste is another approach, and volatile anesthetics are an appropriate targ et in that simple reduction of fresh gas flow (FGF) rates is effective. A m onitor that measures and displays the cost of wasted volatile anesthetic wa s developed and used to determine if real-time display of the cost would re sult in decreased FGF rates, which, in turn, would decrease wasted anesthet ic. Methods. The waste gas monitor (WGM) measures flow rate at the anesthes ia machine's scavenger port, integrates this with agent concentration, and displays the calculated cost, real-time, on a portable computer screen. The WGM equipment was attached to the anesthesia machine in the gynecologic su rgery operating room (OR) and those cases performed under general endotrach eal anesthesia and lasting longer than one hour were eligible for inclusion . First year anesthesiology residents assigned to the study OR as part of a non-specialty rotation, were the subjects of the study. For each resident, after data were collected from at least two eligible baseline cases (Basel ine Phase, WGM not visible and resident unaware of its presence), the monit or was introduced and data collection continued for at least three more eli gible cases (Visible Phase). Results. Nine residents were initially enrolle d, but due to scheduling difficulties only five residents completed the pro tocol. Data from cases using the WGM demonstrated a 50% decrease (3.58 +/- 1.34 l/min vs. 1.78 +/- 0.51 l/min (p = 0.009)) in the scavenger flow rates , which resulted in a 48% ($5.28 +/- 0.68 vs. $2.72 +/- 0.80 (p = 0.002)) d ecrease in hourly cost of wasted volatile anesthetic. There was no differen ce between the Baseline and Visible phases with regard to use of nitrous ox ide or intravenous anesthetic agents. Conclusions. The WGM decreased wasted volatile anesthetic by encouraging decreased FGF rates.