Popular appeal versus expert judgments of motion pictures

Cultural commentators addressing the differences between high art and mere entertainment have suggested that the standards of popular appeal governing the tastes of ordinary consumers differ from the criteria for excellence e mployed by professional critics in rendering expert judgments. These concer ns appear in discussions of the cultural hierarchy (distinguishing among le vels of tastes) and in claims that commercialism tends to degrade cultural objects (by catering to tastes that represent the lowest common denominator ). However, such attacks make assumptions that are generally left untested and that raise at least two key research questions: (RQ1) Do the determinan ts of popular appeal versus expert judgments suggest differing or common st andards of evaluation for consumers versus critics? (RQ2) Do discrepant (sh ared) tastes produce a negative (positive) correlation between popular appe al and expert judgments? The present study addresses these research questio ns for the case of motion pictures. The findings suggest that, at least in the case of films, ordinary consumers and professional critics do emphasize different criteria in the formation of their tastes but that we have reaso n to question critiques based on the implicit assumption of a negative corr elation between popular appeal and expert judgments.