A. Milano et al., Prospective evaluation of frequency and nature of transcranial high-intensity Doppler signals in prosthetic valve recipients, J HEART V D, 8(5), 1999, pp. 488-494
Background and nim of the study: In asymptomatic prosthetic valve recipient
s, high-intensity transient signals (HITS) observed with transcranial Doppl
er (TCD) are a phenomenon of obscure clinical relevance which nature has no
t yet been elucidated convincingly.
Methods: Eighty-three patients without carotid disease, history of cerebrov
ascular accidents, and with negative preoperative TCD undergoing either val
ve replacement (mitral, n = 11; aortic, n = 56; mitral + aortic, n = 6; 40
mechanical prostheses, 29 biological prostheses, 10 homografts) or mitral r
epair (n = 10) were evaluated prospectively by means of TCD at discharge, t
hree months and one year after surgery, to analyze the presence, incidence
and characteristics of HITS. Furthermore, in 12 patients positive for HITS,
TCD was repeated during a 30-min period of 100% O-2 inhalation.
Results: Twenty-five patients (30%) were positive for HITS at all postopera
tive controls, although no neurological symptoms were observed. Mechanical
prostheses showed a significantly higher incidence of HITS (85%) than biolo
gical prostheses (10%, p <0.001), repaired mitral valves (0%, p <0.001) and
homografts (0%, p <0.001). At multivariate analysis the presence of a mech
anical prosthesis was the only significant predictor of detection of HITS a
fter valve replacement. During O-2 inhalation, a significant decrease in th
e number of HITS per hour (55 +/- 79 versus 22 +/- 31, p = 0.002) occurred,
which returned to initial values when room-air breathing was resumed.
Conclusions: Prosthetic valve replacement, particularly when mechanical dev
ices are used, is associated with the generation of HITS which persist thro
ughout the follow up period, but remain clinically silent. The decrease of
HITS during O-2 inhalation strongly supports the hypothesis of the gaseous
nature of such signals and confirms the validity of this method in helping
to differentiate gaseous microemboli from solid microemboli in prosthetic v
alve recipients.