Background: The applications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and laparo
scopy are rapidly expanding. Despite this expansion, our understanding of t
he importance of haptic feedback during laparoscopic surgery is incomplete.
Although many surgeons believe that the use of minimally invasive techniqu
es eliminates force feedback and tactile sensation (haptics), the importanc
e of haptics in MIS has not been fully evaluated. There is considerable int
erest in the development of simulators for MIS even though the importance o
f force feedback remains poorly understood. This study was designed to dete
rmine the ability of experienced surgeons to interpret haptic feedback with
respect to texture, shape, and consistency of an object.
Study Design: A randomized, single-blinded study was designed. Twenty surge
ons were presented objects in a random order, with participants blinded as
to their identity. Inspection by direct palpation, conventional instruments
, and laparoscopic instruments was performed on all objects. Statistic anal
ysis of the data was performed using chi-square analysis and, when appropri
ate, a Fischer exact probability test.
Results: Direct palpation was associated with the highest accuracy for shap
e identification and was superior to both conventional instruments (p < 0.0
01) and laparoscopic instruments (p<0.001). Fine texture analysis with eith
er a conventional instrument or a laparoscopic instrument was superior to d
irect palpation (p < 0.05). Finally, the three methods of analysis were com
parable for consistency analysis.
Conclusions: These data indicate that laparoscopic instruments do, in fact,
provide surgeons with haptic feedback. Interpretation of the texture, shap
e, and consistency of objects can be performed. In some situations, laparos
copic instruments appear to amplify the haptic information available. Our o
ngoing work is directed at further defining force interactions. (J Am Coil
Surg 1939;189:349-355, (C) 1999 by the American College of Surgeons).