We measured the directionality of the cones with both a psychophysical (Sti
les-Crawford I) technique and an optical technique. The two sets of measure
ments were made in the same subjects, with stimuli as similar as possible u
sed. The two types of measurements gave similar estimates of the location i
n the pupil toward which the cones were optimally aligned. However, the two
measurements gave quite dissimilar estimates of the width of the direction
al sensitivity. On average, optical measurements were half as broad as psyc
hophysical measurements in the fovea, but there were substantial individual
differences. At 2-deg retinal eccentricity the difference between techniqu
es was even more marked. (C) 1999 Optical Society of America [S0740-3232(99
)01710-X].