F. San Gil et al., Contribution of adjuvant to adaptive immune responses in mice against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, MICROBIO-UK, 145, 1999, pp. 2595-2603
The authors have previously demonstrated that adjuvant-mediated differences
in early cellular responses to antigens significantly affect subsequent ad
aptive immune responses. To investigate further the contribution of adjuvan
t to adaptive immune responses, outer-membrane proteins (OMP) purified from
the respiratory pathogen Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, given either alo
ne (antigen group) or complexed with SAMA4 (vaccine group), were injected i
ntradermally into groups of mice. Controls were given PBS, Inclusion of adj
uvant did not significantly alter the kinetics of antibody responses agains
t OMP in serum or respiratory tract washings (RTW) over 21 weeks. Re-exposu
re to OMP at 21 weeks also induced identical recall responses in both immun
ized groups. However, differences between the responses of the vaccine and
antigen groups were apparent when sera and RTW were reacted against OMP and
OMP-derived polysaccharide antigens (ODPA). Serum and RTW reactivity again
st protein antigens was stronger in the vaccine group than in the antigen g
roup. Serum and RTW from the vaccine group also reacted against a greater n
umber of proteins than did the antigen group. Although serum reactivity aga
inst ODPA was equivalent for both groups, RTW from the vaccine group reacte
d only faintly against ODPA compared with the antigen group. The results su
ggested that shifting of antibody reactivity away from polysaccharide antig
ens toward protein antigens was an adjuvant-mediated effect, The rapid deat
h of controls following intranasal inoculation confirmed that protection wa
s ultimately dependent on the presence of specific antibodies in the serum
and respiratory tract. However, since both groups responded equally to intr
anasal infection with A, pleuropneumoniae. as seen by the rapid clearance o
f bacteria from the lungs, the biological significance of any differences b
etween the groups was unclear. Knowledge of the effects of adjuvants may pr
ovide a rational basis for adjuvant selection and the ability to manipulate
immunological outcomes more precisely.