Two experiments were conducted to address whether a left hemispheric bias w
ould be observed for categorical processing in both 'what' and 'where' syst
ems (experiment 1) while a reverse bias would characterize coordinate proce
ssing whatever the systems (experiment 2). Young normal subjects were teste
d using divided visual field tasks. The results of experiment 1 indicated t
hat subjects made categorical judgments in both what and where systems fast
er when stimuli are presented to the left hemisphere. The results of experi
ment 2 showed a significant interaction between Visual field and difficulty
of processing coordinate relationships. Indeed, a left-hemisphere advantag
e was observed when the task required easy processing whereas a right-hemis
phere advantage was noted for difficult distinctions either in location (wh
ere system) or in lightness (what system). The left-hemisphere advantage we
observed for categorization in both systems confirms the Kosslyn's hypothe
sis (1989) for the where system and suggests that the same left-hemisphere
advantage also exists for the what system. Concerning coordinate processing
, our findings highlight the influence of processing difficulty on the hemi
spheric lateralization and evidence a right hemispheric advantage for diffi
cult coordinate processing and a left hemispheric advantage for easy coordi
nate processing. The results are discussed in terms of possible link betwee
n on the one hand difficulty and coordinate processing, and easiness and ca
tegorization on the other hand. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights r
eserved.