Wmj. Schoell et al., Separation of sperm and vaginal cells with flow cytometry for DNA typing after sexual assault, OBSTET GYN, 94(4), 1999, pp. 623-627
Background: Successful DNA typing after rape is limited when only a few spe
rm and numerous vaginal cells are recovered from a swab, resulting in an ex
tremely unfavorable ratio of male to female DNA. The goal of this study was
to develop a protocol involving sperm cell sorting with now cytometry base
d on differences in ploidy, major histocompatibility class I, CD45, and cyt
okeratin expression.
Method: Vaginal lavages were mixed with serially diluted ejaculate. After i
mmunostaining and stoichiometric nuclear staining, spermatocytes were isola
ted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. All sorted cells were used for
DNA extraction and subsequent quantitative fluorescent multiplex polymerase
chain reaction. The preferential lysis was performed for comparison.
Experience: The sorting procedure was superior to the preferential lysis me
thod within all tested conditions. In unfavorable dilutions, the male DNA c
ould be identified only after cell sorting with now cytometry.
Conclusion: We were able to show that separation of sperm and vaginal cells
using cell sorting with now cytometry may be crucial when there are only m
icrotraces of sperm detectable after rape. (Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:623-7, (
C) 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).