Long-term predicatable nipple projection following reconstruction

Citation
Jw. Few et al., Long-term predicatable nipple projection following reconstruction, PLAS R SURG, 104(5), 1999, pp. 1321-1324
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
ISSN journal
00321052 → ACNP
Volume
104
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1321 - 1324
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-1052(199910)104:5<1321:LPNPFR>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The creation of the nipple-areola complex is often the final step in the su rgical treatment of breast cancer patients, and it consequently has importa nt symbolic and aesthetic implications. Patient expectations and the need f or symmetry make nipple projection a crucial aesthetic determinant of nippl e reconstruction. We hypothesize that long-term nipple projection and shape can be achieved in a predictable fashion using the modified star dermal fa t flap technique. Prospectively, 93 nipples were reconstructed by a single surgeon using a modified star dermal fat flap technique in 44 implant and 4 9 TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Flap dimensions (base diameter and flap length) were designed according to patient desire or to the base diameter and projection of the opposite breast nipple. A standardized, 3-month posto perative care regimen was observed in all patients. Nipple projection was a ssessed by the same observer at each follow-up examination. The average len gth of follow-up was 730 days (745 for TRAM reconstructions and 713 for imp lants). Consistently, an average of 41 percent of the intraoperative projec tion remained intact in both groups at final evaluation (SD 12 percent). Th e total flap length was strongly predictive of intraoperative and long-term projection (r = 0.64 and 0.86, p < 0.0001). Flap lengths ranged from 5.5 t o 9.0 cm, and in a linear correlation, resulted in intraoperative projectio n of 1.0 to 2.1 cm, respectively, and long-term projection of 0.4 to 0.83 c m, respectively. Based on the linear relationship, every 1-cm increase in f lap length could be expected to result in a 0.16-cm increase in projection. When controlled for flap length and intraoperative projection, there was n o difference between TRAM and implant nipple reconstruction in predicting p ostoperative nipple projection. Intraoperative planning and execution are c ritical to achieve predictable nipple shape, size, and projection. The dime nsions of the star dermal fat flap can be strategically modified to allow t he surgeon predictable projection with a consistent 41-percent preservation of intraoperative nipple projection in both TRAM. and implant patients at 2 years.