Combined gluteoplasty: Liposuction and lipoinjection

Citation
L. Cardenas-camarena et al., Combined gluteoplasty: Liposuction and lipoinjection, PLAS R SURG, 104(5), 1999, pp. 1524-1531
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
ISSN journal
00321052 → ACNP
Volume
104
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1524 - 1531
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-1052(199910)104:5<1524:CGLAL>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
From April of 1995 to August of 1998, 62 female and four male patients had gluteoplasties. To improve the gluteal region, two techniques that create e xcellent results in other parts of the body, liposuction and lipoinjection, were combined. The ages of the patients ranged from 18 to 52 years (mean, 31 years). Liposuction was done with a tumescent technique in the lumbosacr al, trochanteric, and subgluteal region to improve gluteal shape. The amoun t of fat aspirated was only that necessary to obtain the desired contour. I n all cases, liposuction was also performed in other areas. Lipoinjection w as done with round-tip cannulas in different planes of the gluteal region, and the fat was applied in small strips. The quantity of fat infiltrated va ried from 120 to 280 cc per gluteus, with a mean of 210 cc. The results wer e evaluated by the patients and the surgical team with preoperative and pos toperative photographs. Followup ranged from 3 months to 3 years and 5 mont hs, with a mean of 17 months. No patient was dissatisfied with the results, and more than 90 percent considered their results good or excellent. Lipos uction complications consisted of four seromas, six visible irregularities, and two palpable irregularities. Lipoinjection complications occurred in 1 6 gluteus regions (12 percent); all had gluteal temporal hyperemia and eryt hema, which resolved with conservative treatment except in one case (4 cc o f sterile material corresponding to fat necrosis was drained in that patien t). No irregularities or depressions occurred in the gluteus. One case of p robable fat embolism syndrome had a satisfactory evolution. This gluteoplas ty technique is simple and low in cost, with minimal morbidity and very goo d results. It is important to note that a good result does not depend on a great amount of fat infiltration but rather on a harmonious way of combinin g both surgical procedures: fat elimination by liposuction and gluteus augm entation by lipoinjection.