Evaluation and assessment are methods might work could not be reached. On t
he basis of critical issues in GASP experiments. Automated procedures are n
ecessary to compare a large number of predictions with the target folds. Th
e evaluation has to reveal the maximum extent of similarity between predict
ions and targets, it should be applicable across prediction categories, and
it should be transparent and accessible to a wide community. Here we prese
nt an automated evaluation scheme which is an attempt to meet these require
ments. In the implementation and execution of this scheme we had to solve o
r circumvent problems of convergence, where algorithms fail to find optimum
solutions, problems of ambiguity where no unique optimum solution exists,
and problems in ranking and interpretation. Key features of this implementa
tion are (1) the root mean square deviation of structure superimposition is
kept close to a constant value throughout the evaluation and (2) all struc
tural matches found between two folds are taken into account. We discuss th
ese points in detail and describe the numerical criteria used in the CASP3
evaluation. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.