The authors comment on D. F. Hultsch, C. Hertzog, B. J. Small, and R. A. Di
xon's (1999) report of the latest results of the Victoria Longitudinal Stud
y, which are presented as a test of the engagement hypothesis, and on their
reanalysis of the data from the Veterans Study (Pushkar Gold et al., 1995)
, which proposes an alternative model of intellectual function. Differences
between the methodologies, variables, and concepts of engaged lifestyle in
the 2 studies lead to different tests of the engagement hypothesis and dif
ferent conclusions. Failure to report specified paths and unjustified assum
ptions lessen the credibility of the Hultsch et al. model for the Veterans
Study data. The authors conclude that their original model, which indicates
a small but significant effect of engaged adult lifestyle on the maintenan
ce of intellectual verbal abilities in later life, provides a better explan
ation of the Veterans Study data.