Jm. Hrung et al., Cost-effectiveness of MR imaging and core-needle biopsy in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions, RADIOLOGY, 213(1), 1999, pp. 39-49
Citations number
80
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical and economic consequences of the use of pre
operative breast magnetic resonance(MR) imaging and core-needle biopsy (CNB
) to avert excisional biopsy (EXB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to
compare MR imaging, CNB, and EXB without preoperative testing in a woman wi
th it suspicious breast lesion. Stage-specific cancer prevalence, tumor rec
urrence, progression rates, and MR imaging and CNB sensitivity and specific
ity were obtained from the literature. Cost estimates were obtained from th
e literature and from the Medicare fee schedule.
RESULTS: EXB without preoperative testing was associated with the greatest
quality-adjusted life expectancy, followed by MR imaging and CNB; life expe
ctancies were 17.409, 17.405, and 17.398 years, respectively. EXB resulted
in the greatest lifetime treatment cost ($31,438), followed by MR imaging (
$29,072) and CNB ($28,573). Results were robust over a wide range of cancer
prevalence, stage distribution, tumor progression rates, and procedure and
treatment costs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios showed that preoper
ative testing was cost-effective, but the choice between MR imaging and CNB
was highly dependent on the accuracy of each test and to patient preferenc
es.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative testing of most suspicious breast lesions was cost
-effective. More precise estimates of MR imaging and CNB test performance c
haracteristics are needed. Until those are available, patient preferences s
hould inform individual decisions regarding preoperative testing.