PURPOSE: To determine the weighted average sensitivity of magnetic resonanc
e (MR) imaging in the prospective detection of acute neck Injury and to com
pare these findings with those of a comprehensive conventional radiographic
assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional radiography and MR imaging were perform
ed in 199 patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with suspected cer
vical spine injury. Weighted sensitivities and specificities were calculate
d, and a weighted average across eight vertebral levels from C1 to T1 was f
ormed. Fourteen parameters indicative of acute injury were tabulated.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients had 172 acute cervical injuries. MR imaging d
epicted 136 (79%) acute abnormalities and conventional radiography depicted
39 (23%). For assessment of acute fractures, MR images (weighted average s
ensitivity, 43%; CI: 21%, 66%) were comparable to conventional radiographs
(weighted average sensitivity, 48%; CI: 30%, 65%). MR imaging was superior
to conventional radiography in the evaluation of pre- or paravertebral hemo
rrhage or edema, anterior or posterior longitudinal ligament injury, trauma
tic disk herniation, cord edema, and cord compression. Cord injuries were a
ssociated with cervical spine spondylosis (P <.05), acute fracture (P <.001
), and canal stenosis (P <.001).
CONCLUSION: MR imaging is more accurate than radiography in the detection o
f a wide spectrum of neck injuries, and further study is warranted of its p
otential effect on medical decision making, clinical outcome, and cost-effe
ctiveness.