S. Gallicchio et A. Maiorano, Revised stratigraphy of the Serra Palazzo Formation, a Miocene foredeep turbidite succession of the Southern Apennines (Italy), RIV IT PAL, 105(2), 1999, pp. 287-301
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
Rivista italiana di paleontologia e stratigrafia (Testo stampato)
This paper illustrates a new structural and stratigraphic framework of the
Serra Palazzo Formation, a Miocene turbidite succession cropping our at the
outer border of the Southern Apennines. The study was performed in the typ
e area of the Serra Palazzo Formation, in the neighbourhood of Stigliano vi
llage Basilicata, Southern Italy).
Structural data indicate that in the area under study the Serra Palazzo For
mation has been split into different east-verging thrust sheers, whose deco
llement level is localized in the upper parr of the Flysch Rosso Formation.
The stratigraphy of the formation is shown in two sections (S1 and S2), wh
ich belong to two superimposed thrust sheets. Quantitative biostratigraphic
analyses were performed on the calcareous nannofossil assemblages.
The study shows that the Serra Palazzo Formation is about 500 m thick in th
e type area and from bottom to top consists of: a) a lower, coarse-grained
siliciclastic turbidite unit (Tempa Cisterna Member), which lies stratigrap
hically on the Flysch Numidico Formation and is Burdigalian-Langhian in age
; b) an upper siliciclastic and calciclastic, fine-grained turbidite unit.
(Jazzo Porcellini Member) that is Serravallian in age. The Jazzo Porcellini
Member passes upward into the Marne argillose del Toppo Capuana Formation,
of Serravanian-Tortonian age.
The Tempa Cisterna Member, which has a northwestern feeding area, reaches i
ts maximum thickness (350 m) in the inner thrust sheet; on the contrary, th
e Jazzo Porcellini Member shows evidence of a consistent eastern supply and
has its maximum thickness (250 m) in the outer thrust sheet.
Preliminary studies suggest that the stratigraphic framework of the Serra P
alazzo Formation as reconstructed in the study area can be recognised also
in other areas of the Southern Apennines; these observations provide new da
ta on the evolution of the Southern Apennines Miocene foredeep.