W. Caetano et M. Tabak, Interaction of chlorpromazine and trifluoperazine with ionic micelles: electronic absorption spectroscopy studies, SPECT ACT A, 55(12), 1999, pp. 2513-2528
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY
The characteristics of binding of two phenothiazine antipsychotic drugs, na
mely, chlorpromazine (CPZ) and trifluoperazine (TFP), to cationic cetyltrim
ethylammonium chloride (CTAC), zwitterionic N-hexadecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-ammo
nio-1-propanesulfonate (HPS), neutral t-octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol (TRIT
ON X-100) and polyoxyethylene dodecyl ether (Brij-35) micelles were investi
gated using electronic absorption spectroscopy. Binding constants K-b and p
K(a) values of drugs in micelles were estimated using the red shifts of the
maximum absorption upon alkalization or in the presence of detergents. The
pK(a) of TFP seems to be shifted by 2.5-4.1 units to lower values in the p
resence of different surfactants as compared to the experimental value of p
K(a) obtained in buffer which is around 7.0. Consideration of the second pK
(a) around 4.0 reported in the literature for TFP leads to a better rationa
lization of pK(a) changes for this compound. The changes in pK(a) contribut
ed by electrostatic effects are all positive, small for CTAC (+ 0.2), and g
reater for HPS (+ 0.9). For CPZ the pK(a) shift due to its interaction with
micelles is in the 0.7-2.3 range, the direction of the shift depending on
the charge of the polar head. The electrostatic contribution for the shift
is great for CTAC (- 0.8) and smaller for HPS (+ 0.2). This result suggests
a more polar localization in the micelle of CPZ as compared to TFP. The va
lues of binding constants K-b for TFP and CPZ in different protonation stat
es show that electrostatic interactions are essential in the affinity of th
e drugs to micelles bearing different charges on their headgroups (CTAC, HP
S). Data for Brij-35 demonstrate that the additional charge on the TFP ring
at pH 2.0 leads to a decrease of binding constant probably due to the repu
lsion of the phenothiazine ring from the protons accumulated at the polar h
ead of the micelle at acidic pH values. For this micelle at pH 5.0 TFP has
a K-b 3-fold greater than that for CPZ while at pH 2.0 K-b for TFP is 3-fol
d less than that for CPZ. So, for more hydrophobic TFP electrostatic intera
ctions due to protonation of the ring are quite important even considering
its penetration into the micelle interior as compared to CPZ. (C) 1999 Else
vier Science B.V. All rights reserved.