Increased carbon monoxide in exhaled air of patients with cystic fibrosis

Citation
P. Paredi et al., Increased carbon monoxide in exhaled air of patients with cystic fibrosis, THORAX, 54(10), 1999, pp. 917-920
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
THORAX
ISSN journal
00406376 → ACNP
Volume
54
Issue
10
Year of publication
1999
Pages
917 - 920
Database
ISI
SICI code
0040-6376(199910)54:10<917:ICMIEA>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Background-Inflammation, oxidative stress, and recurrent pulmonary infectio ns are major aggravating factors in cystic fibrosis. Nitric oxide (NO), a m arker of inflammation, is not increased, however, probably because it is me tabolised to peroxynitrite. Exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), a product of heme degradation by heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) which is induced by inflammatory cy tokines and oxidants, was therefore tested as a noninvasive marker of airwa y inflammation and oxidative stress. Methods-Exhaled CO and NO concentrations were measured in 29 patients (15 m en) with cystic fibrosis of mean (SD) age 25 (1) years, forced expiratory v olume in one second (FEV,) 43 (6)%, 14 of whom were receiving steroid treat ment. Results-The concentration of exhaled CO was higher in patients with cystic fibrosis (6.7 (0.6) ppm) than in 15 healthy subjects (eight men) aged 31 (3 ) years (2.4 (0.4) ppm, mean difference 4.3 (95% CI 2.3 to 6.1), p < 0.001) . Patients not receiving steroid treatment had higher CO levels (8.4 (1.0) ppm) than treated patients (5.1 (0.5) ppm, mean difference 3.3 (95% CI -5.7 to -0.9), p < 0.01). Normal subjects had higher NO levels (6.8 (0.4)ppb) t han patients with cystic fibrosis (3.2 (0.2) ppb, mean difference 3.8 (95% CI 2.6 to 4.9), p < 0.05) and were not influenced by steroid treatment (3.8 (0.4) ppb and 2.7 (0.3) ppb for treated and untreated patients, respective ly, mean difference 0.8 (95% CI -0.6 to 2.3), p > 0.05). Patients homozygou s for the Delta F508 CFTR mutation had higher CO and NO concentrations than heterozygous patients (CO: 7.7 (1.8)ppm and 4.0 (0.6) ppm, respectively, m ean difference 3.7 (95% CI -7.1 to -0.3), p < 0.05; NO: 4.1 (0.5) ppb and 1 .9 (0.7) ppb, respectively, mean difference 2.2 (95% CI -3.7 to -0.6), p < 0.05). Conclusions-High exhaled CO concentrations in patients with cystic fibrosis may reflect induction of HO-1. Measurement of exhaled CO concentrations ma y be clinically useful in the management and monitoring of oxidation and in flammatory mediated lung injury.