ASSESSMENT OF METHODS FOR STUDYING THE DISSOLUTION OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZERS OF DIFFERING SOLUBILITY IN SOIL .3. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RATE OF DISSOLUTION AND PLANT-RESPONSE
Hj. Di et al., ASSESSMENT OF METHODS FOR STUDYING THE DISSOLUTION OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZERS OF DIFFERING SOLUBILITY IN SOIL .3. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RATE OF DISSOLUTION AND PLANT-RESPONSE, Fertilizer research, 38(1), 1994, pp. 19-27
Relationships between plant response and rates of dissolution of groun
d (< 150 mum) North Carolina phosphate rock (NCPR), NCPR 30% acidulate
d with phosphoric acid (NCPAPR) and monocalcium phosphate (MCP) were a
ssessed in pot experiments. The three fertilizers were incubated for 1
, 50 and 111 days, at the rates of 75, 150 and 750 mug P g-1 soil, usi
ng two soils with different P-retention capacity. After each period of
incubation, four pots were set up from each treatment, and perennial
ryegrass (Lolium perenne) was grown in a growth chamber for about six
weeks to asses the agronomic effectiveness of the fertilizers. Results
in dry matter yield and P uptake showed that immediately following ap
plication (1 day incubation), the MCP (solution) was supplying more P
to plants than either the NCPR or the NCPAPR applied at the same rate.
After 50 and 111 days of incubation, the NCPR and NCPAPR were just as
effective in the lower P-retention Tekapo soil. The relative agronomi
c effectiveness (RAE) of the NCPR and NCPAPR compared with MCP was gen
erally poorer in the higher P-retention Craigieburn soil than in the T
ekapo soil shortly after application, but improved with time of incuba
tion. Ryegrass responses to the application of the three fertilzers co
rresponded to the changing trends of exchangeable P in the soils, meas
ured by the isotopic method. Regressions were made between plant P upt
ake and indices describing the intensity factor (water extractable P),
quantity factor (Bray I P, Olsen P, 0.5 M NaOH extractable P and isot
opic exchangeable P) and the kinetic factor (F(in)) of soil P supply t
o plants in the Tekapo soil. The percentage of variation in plant P up
take explained by individual indices was generally less than 80%, no m
atter which of the three single variable models, the Mitscherlich, the
quadratic or the power function was fitted. However, more than 96% of
the variation in plant P uptake in the Tekapo soil could be explained
by the power function models involving two variable. The rate of P di
ssolution (F(in)) determined by the isotopic dilution method was inclu
ded in all the two variable models. The results suggest that assessmen
t of soil P supply to plants should consider the kinetic factor in add
ition to the intensity and quantity factors, particularly where P fert
ilizers with differing solubility are applied.