Development of a nomogram that predicts the probability of a positive prostate biopsy in men with an abnormal digital rectal examination and a prostate-specific antigen between 0 and 4 ng/mL
Ja. Eastham et al., Development of a nomogram that predicts the probability of a positive prostate biopsy in men with an abnormal digital rectal examination and a prostate-specific antigen between 0 and 4 ng/mL, UROLOGY, 54(4), 1999, pp. 709-713
Objectives. Early detection of prostate cancer traditionally involves both
digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)
determination in an informed patient population. Abnormalities in either of
these studies typically lead to additional evaluations, including prostate
biopsy. In this study, we analyzed the operational characteristics of seru
m PSA between 0 and 4 ng/mL as an initial test for prostate cancer.
Methods. From January 1990 through May 1997, transrectal biopsies were obta
ined from 700 men with a serum PSA level less than 4.0 ng/mL but DRE suspic
ious for cancer. Patient age, race, and serum PSA level were reviewed for t
his study.
Results. Of the 700 men studied, 445 were white (64%) and 255 were African
American (36%). In multivariate analysis of prebiopsy risk factors (age, ra
ce, serum PSA), serum PSA was the only independent predictor of a positive
prostate biopsy. A nomogram was created that determines the worst-case prob
ability of a positive prostate biopsy in men with PSA between 0 and 4 ng/mL
and a DRE suspicious for cancer. The predictions from the nomogram appeare
d accurate and discriminating, with a bias-corrected area under the receive
r operating characteristic curve (ie, comparison of the predicted probabili
ty with the actual outcome) of 0.75.
Conclusions. Although early detection of prostate cancer has traditionally
used both PSA measurement and DRE, PSA testing alone could be more easily i
mplemented and may encourage some men to seek consultation who might not ot
herwise have done so. By providing a nomogram which provides a worse-case s
cenario (assuming a positive DRE) of the probability of a positive biopsy,
the patient and clinician can make an informed decision as to whether addit
ional evaluation is warranted. (C) 1999, Elsevier Science inc.