Although erratic at times, a poison center's (PC) call volume is generally
predictable, but an emergent increase in call volume from an alarmed public
can rapidly overwhelm existing personnel making it difficult to manage tru
e emergencies. This is illustrated by a product recall concerning food alle
gedly contaminated with asbestos occurring in January 1998. Utilizing an on
-line database, all calls over a 5-d period concerning this recall were rev
iewed and tabulated by both the date and time received. Corporate communica
tions polled the print, radio and TV media to determine when the product re
call stories were presented. This information was compared to and correlate
d with the Regional Poison Information Center (RPIC) call volume. Over a 5-
d period the RPIC responded to 487 calls regarding the recall with 86.2% re
ceived in the first 33 h after the initial broadcast. During this 33-h peri
od a total of 797 calls were documented at the RPIC indicating 52.7% of the
call volume being related to the recall. Over the same period 4 local TV a
nd radio stations broadcast the story 33 times with 1 station airing it 19
times in a 24-h period. Two newspaper stories were published. The public ha
s a right to be alerted to potential health hazards, but a sudden increase
in calls to a PC can be crippling. Based on this and similar experiences ou
r PC developed a strategy, in concert with corporate communications, to res
pond to future incidents with the goal of reducing the adverse impact on PC
call volume through the promotion of balanced and responsible information.