Evaluation of injuries to Virginia opossums captured in the EGG (TM) trap

Citation
Gf. Hubert et al., Evaluation of injuries to Virginia opossums captured in the EGG (TM) trap, WILDL SOC B, 27(2), 1999, pp. 301-305
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
ISSN journal
00917648 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
301 - 305
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-7648(199922)27:2<301:EOITVO>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Concern about animal welfare has stimulated much research and development o f restraining traps considered more humane to capture furbearers. However, in formation about injuries to Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana) cap tured in such devices remains limited. We evaluated injuries sustained by o possums captured in the EGG(TM) trap. We caught all animals in central Illi nois during the 1996 and 1997 trapping seasons. Traps were staked solidly a nd checked daily beginning in early morning. We determined trap-related inj uries using radiographs and whole body necropsies. The mean total (whole bo dy) injury score based on a modified Olsen scoring system was 47 (n=40, ran ge=1-223, SE=11). Most opossums (75%) had total injury scores <50. We calcu lated an injury performance threshold of 123 points for the EGG (i.e., base d on our study, greater than or equal to 70% of the opossums captured in EG G traps could be expected to score less than or equal to 123 points with 95 % confidence). Severe injury scores (those >125) were limited to opossums w eighing less than or equal to 1.9 kg. Injury scores for small (less than or equal to 1.9-kg) opossums (n=10) were higher than those for large (>1.9-kg ) opossums (n=30) (P=0.002). We recommend additional field testing to compa re efficiency of the EGG trap with other restraining devices commonly used to capture opossums.