Background: The clinical advantage of opioid rotation is probably due to in
complete cross-tolerance favouring analgesia more than adverse effects. The
objectives of opioid rotation in chronic non-malignant patients are 1): ro
tation between different long-acting opioids (LAO) to improve analgesia and
reduce side-effects, and 2): rotation from short-acting opioids (SAO) to L
AO to establish stable analgesia in order to minimise withdrawal symptoms,
risk of tolerance and addiction.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 37 rotations between different LAO and
59 rotations from SAO to LAO.
Results The main reason for opioid rotation was insufficient pain relief. O
pioid rotations resulted in significantly better pain control in 59% (CI95=
49-76%) of the patients rotated between different LAO and 73% (CI95 =60-84%
) of the patients rotated from SAO to LAO. During rotations symptoms of wit
hdrawal and overdosing were relatively frequent in both groups. No signific
ant dose changes were seen when rotating between different LAO. However, th
e consequence of rotation from SAO to LAO was a 74% increase in the opioid
dose (CI95 =30-117%).
Conclusion: Opioid rotations between different LAO resulted in better pain
control and fewer side-effects at dose levels predicted to be equianalgesic
. The majority of the patients rotated from SAO to LAO obtained improved an
algesia, but the cost was a 74% increase in the opioid dose.