Oil mist concentration: A comparison of sampling methods

Citation
J. Volckens et al., Oil mist concentration: A comparison of sampling methods, AM IND HYG, 60(5), 1999, pp. 684-689
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00028894 → ACNP
Volume
60
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
684 - 689
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8894(199909/10)60:5<684:OMCACO>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Discrepancies arise when sampling mineral oil mist using a glass fiber filt er, a polyvinyl chloride filter, a polytetrafluoroethylene filter, an elect rostatic precipitator, and two light-scattering devices. Most gravimetric m ethods show discrepancies because mist droplets, which have a high surface area, evaporate from the filters during sampling. Inconsistencies occur wit h lightscattering devices because these instruments are sensitive to partic le size distributions, shapes, and refractive indices. Results from laborat ory and field experiments show that concentrations measured using these met hods vary by factors of two to five. Discrepancies were greatest when oil m ist concentrations were relatively low.