Nj. Shaheen et al., Hyoscyamine as a pharmacological adjunct in colonoscopy: A randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled trial, AM J GASTRO, 94(10), 1999, pp. 2905-2908
OBJECTIVE: Investigators have assessed the utility of antispasmodic agents
in colonoscopy, with conflicting results. The aim of this study is to deter
mine the effects of premedication with hyoscyamine, an anticholinergic anti
spasmodic, on outcomes in colonoscopy.
METHODS: A total of 165 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were rando
mized in a double blinded fashion to one of three arms: intravenous hyoscya
mine (0.25 mg), oral hyoscyamine (0.25 mg), or placebo, administered 20-40
min before colonoscopy. Primary outcome measures included insertion time to
cecum, patient's assessment of pain, and physician assessment of spasm. Se
condary outcome measures included amount of analgesic medications used, tot
al procedure time, amount and type of pathology visualized, and physician a
ssessment of patient's pain.
RESULTS: Bivariate analysis showed no difference, between the three groups
in insertion time (13.8 min, 14.8 min, and 13.8 min for placebo, intravenou
s hyoscyamine, and oral hyocyamine, respectively), analgesic medication nec
essary, or any other primary or secondary outcome variable. Multivariate an
alysis controlling for potential confounders also failed to demonstrate any
differences between the groups. Women had higher procedure duration and an
algesic requirement, and reported more pain than did men.
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled trial did
not demonstrate efficacy of either intravenous or oral hyoscyamine as a pre
medication for colonoscopy. (C) 1999 by Am. Cell. of Gastroenterology.