Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of endoleaks

Citation
La. Karch et al., Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of endoleaks, AM J SURG, 178(3), 1999, pp. 225-231
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00029610 → ACNP
Volume
178
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
225 - 231
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(199909)178:3<225:AFTDAT>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has sh own promising early results. However, endoleaks present a new and challengi ng obstacle to successful aneurysm exclusion. We report our experience with primary, persistent endoleaks and provide an algorithm for their diagnosis and management. METHODS: Over a 19-month period, 73 patients underwent endoluminal repair o f their AAAs using a modular bifurcated endograft as part of a US FDA Inves tigational Device Exemption trial. Spiral computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed prior to discharge after repair to evaluate for complete ane urysm exclusion. If no endoleak was present on that initial CT scan, color- flow duplex scanning was performed at 1 month, with repeat CT scanning at 6 months and 1 year. If the initial CT scan revealed the presence of an endo leak, repeat CT scanning was performed at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months, o r until the endoleak resolved. Any patient with an endoleak that persisted beyond 3 months underwent angiographic evaluation to localize the source of the leak. RESULTS: At 1 month, 62 patients (85%) had successful aneurysm exclusion. T he remaining 11 patients (15%) had primary endoleaks, 8 (11%) of which pers isted beyond 3 months, prompting angiographic evaluation. In 2 patients the endoleak was related to a graft-graft or graft-arterial junction. One was from the endograft terminus in the common iliac artery and was successfully embolized, along with its outflow lumbar artery. The other required placem ent of an additional endograft component across a leaking graft-graft junct ion to successfully exclude the aneurysm. The remaining six endoleaks were due to collateral flow through the aneurysm sac. In 4 cases this was lumbar to lumbar flow fed by hypogastric artery collaterals to the inflow lumbar artery. In the remaining 2 patients the endoleak was found to be due to flo w between a lumbar and inferior mesenteric artery, Resolution of the endole ak by coil embolization of the feeding hypogastric artery branch in 1 patie nt was unsuccessful due to rapid recruitment of another hypogastric branch. Two of 1:he six collateral flow endoleaks have resolved spontaneously with out treatment, while the remaining cases have been followed up without evid ence of aneurysm expansion. CONCLUSION: Systematic postoperative surveillance facilitates proper diagno sis and treatment of endoleaks. This involves serial CT scans to detect the presence of endoleaks, followed by angiography to determine their etiology and guide treatment, if clinically indicated. (C) 1999 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.