Six-month assessment of a phase I trial of angiogenic gene therapy for thetreatment of coronary artery disease using direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing the VEGF121 cDNA

Citation
Tk. Rosengart et al., Six-month assessment of a phase I trial of angiogenic gene therapy for thetreatment of coronary artery disease using direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing the VEGF121 cDNA, ANN SURG, 230(4), 1999, pp. 466-470
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANNALS OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00034932 → ACNP
Volume
230
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
466 - 470
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4932(199910)230:4<466:SAOAPI>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Objective To summarize the 6-month follow-up of a cohort of patients with c linically significant coronary artery disease who received direct myocardia l injection of an E1(-)E3(-) adenovirus (Ad) gene transfer vector (Ad(GV)VE GF121.10) expressing the human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 12 1 cDNA to induce therapeutic angiogenesis. Background Therapeutic angiogenesis describes a novel approach to the treat ment of vascular occlusive disease that uses the administration of growth f actors known to induce neovascularization of ischemic tissues. Methods Direct myocardial injection of Ad(GV)VEGF121.10 into an area of rev ersible ischemia was carried out in 21 patients as an adjunct to convention al coronary artery bypass grafting (group A, n = 15) or as sole therapy usi ng a minithoracotomy (group B, n = 6). Results No evidence of systemic or cardiac-related adverse events related t o vector administration was observed up to 6 months after therapy. Trends t oward improvement in angina class and exercise treadmill testing at 6-month follow-up in the sole therapy group suggest the effects of this therapy ar e persistent for greater than or equal to 6 months. Conclusions This study suggests that direct myocardial administration of Ad (GV)VEGF121.10 appears to be well tolerated in patients with clinically sig nificant coronary artery disease, initiation of phase II evaluation of this therapy appears warranted.