Am. Wilson et Bj. Lipworth, Short-term dose-response relationships for the relative systemic effects of oral prednisolone and inhaled fluticasone in asthmatic adults, BR J CL PH, 48(4), 1999, pp. 579-585
Aims To determine the systemic dose-response relationships with oral predni
solone and inhaled fluticasone propionate administered in a putative 11 : 1
mg equivalent basis, in terms of effects on adrenal, bone and haematologic
al markers.
Methods Twelve asthmatic patients mean (s.e.) age, 28.8 [3.3] years, FEV1 9
4.7 [3.6]% predicted, FEF25-75 65.5 [6.1]% predicted were studied in a doub
le-blind, double dummy randomised crossover design comparing placebo, inhal
ed fluticasone propionate via volumatic spacer given twice a day (ex actuat
or dose 0.44 mg day(-1), 0.88 mg day(-) (1), 1.76 mg day(-1)) and oral pred
nisolone given once daily (5 mg day(-1), 10 mg day(-1), 20 mg day(-1)). All
treatments were for 4 days at each dose level with a 7-day washout at cros
sover. Measurements were made at 08.00 h after the last dose of each dose l
evel for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin and blood eosinophil count.
Results There were significant dose-related effects for suppression of all
three endpoints with both prednisolone and fluticasone propionate. Parallel
slope analysis revealed a calculated dose ratio for relative potency of 8.
5 : 1 mg (95% CI 5.7-11.2) comparing Pred with FP for morning cortisol. The
magnitude of suppression with FP was less for osteocalcin and eosinophils
than for cortisol.
Conclusions Systemic tissues exhibit different dose-response relationships
for the effects of inhaled and oral corticosteroids with suppression of cor
tisol being greater than osteocalcin or eosinophils. For cortisol suppressi
on we observed an 8.5:1 mg relative potency ratio comparing prednisolone wi
th fluticasone propionate. Patients taking high dose inhaled fluticasone pr
opionate should therefore be screened for evidence of impaired adrenal rese
rve.