Supporting practice-based audit: a price to be paid for collecting data

Citation
Jrm. Lough et al., Supporting practice-based audit: a price to be paid for collecting data, BR J GEN PR, 49(447), 1999, pp. 793-795
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
ISSN journal
09601643 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
447
Year of publication
1999
Pages
793 - 795
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-1643(199910)49:447<793:SPAAPT>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Background. There has been considerable investment by health authorities in the funding of support staff whose job is to collect data for audit purpos es. It is important to understand what costs are involved in such a data co llection exercise. The cost advantages of using existing practice staff or externally funded staff are not known. Aim, To assess the cost of transposing data on workload to computer softwar e for audit purposes and retrieving data on five chronic diseases from case records. Method. Four audit support staff monitored the time taken to collect specif ic data as part of a broad audit programme in 12 training practices within one health board area in the West of Scotland in 1997. The time taken was u sed to estimate comparative costs for using a receptionist or practice nurs e for carrying out a similar exercise. Results, Average costs for collecting data per 1000 patients for waiting ti me, appointments, recall, and telephone audits were pound 5.24 for receptio n staff pound 5.64 for audit support staff, and pound 9.68 for a practice n urse. The average cost for collecting data per patient with diabetes, asthm a, epilepsy, hypertension, or rheumatoid arthritis was pound 1.48 for recep tion staff, pound 1.60 for audit support staff, and pound 2.74 for a practi ce nurse, Conclusions. The cost of collecting data varies considerably depending on w hich staff are chosen for the purpose. Practices should consider carefully how best to collect data for audit in terms of cost.