Background: The surgeon is an important variable that influences outcome fo
llowing colorectal cancer surgery. Operative training of suitable quality a
nd quantity is essential if intersurgeon variation is to be reduced. The ai
m of this study was to examine the outcome of colorectal cancer surgery whe
n a high proportion of the operations were performed by trainee surgeons.
Methods: A prospective 7-year (1989-1996) audit of 306 consecutive colorect
al cancers referred to a single general surgeon with a colorectal interest
was carried out. The outcome (anastomotic leakage, 30-day mortality rate, l
ocal recurrence and cancer-related survival) of operations performed by the
consultant was compared with that of his trainees.
Results: Some 245 (92.5 per cent) of 265 patients undergoing laparotomy had
a resection. Seventy (28.6 per cent) and 67 (27.3 per cent) of operations
were performed by supervised and independent trainees respectively. There w
as no difference between the consultant, supervised and independent trainee
s for 30-day mortality rate (6.5, 6 and 4 per cent respectively), clinical
anastomotic leakage rate (9, 2 and 5 per cent) and local recurrence rate (2
, 3 and 7 per cent). There was no difference between the three groups for a
djusted 5-year disease-related survival rates.
Conclusion: Properly supervised trainees can resect a high proportion of co
lorectal cancers without compromising immediate outcome or long-term surviv
al.