Efficiency of a downstream bypass as estimated by the mark-recapture technique and behaviour of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts at the Bedouswater intake on the Aspe River (France) monitored by radiotelemetry
M. Chanseau et al., Efficiency of a downstream bypass as estimated by the mark-recapture technique and behaviour of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts at the Bedouswater intake on the Aspe River (France) monitored by radiotelemetry, B FR PECHE, (353-54), 1999, pp. 99-120
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
BULLETIN FRANCAIS DE LA PECHE ET DE LA PISCICULTURE
Two experiments were conducted at the Bedous water intake on the Aspe River
in 1995 and 1998 to test the efficiency of a downstream bypass for salmon
smolts (Salmo salar L.).
The surface bypass was located on the right bank a little way upstream from
the trashrack. During the experiment period, the discharge into the bypass
varied from 0.4 m(3)/s to 1.2 m(3)/s, representing from 1.6% to 4.3% of th
e turbine discharge. The efficiency of the device was evaluated using the m
ark-recapture technique. The behaviour of smolts in the intake canal was st
udied using radiotelemetry.
In 1995 the bypass efficiency was very low (with a success rate of 17%), du
e mainly to hydraulic conditions. A training wall was built in 1997 to reve
rse the flow pattern in the canal and to better guide the fish to the water
intake of the bypass. The mean efficiency of the bypass was thus improved
with 55% of the smolts being recaptured in the trap in 1998. The efficiency
of the device and the smolt behaviour were directly affected by the turbin
e operation and the hydraulic conditions in the intake channel. It appeared
that a smaller proportion of smolts of less than 19 cm in length were reca
ptured in the trap and that in spite of the tangential component of the vel
ocity which created a louver effect, size selection was due to the spacing
between the bars of the trashracks (30 mm). A light placed near the bypass
entrance appeared to have no effect on the movement patterns of the smolts
with the hydraulic factor being preponderant. However, the light did affect
the rhythm of capture in the trap as more fish were captured when it was t
urned off.