Relying on culture as an important explanatory variable is regarded with sk
epticism by many contemporary political scientists. Yet, doubts about cultu
re's usefulness rest in large parton false perceptions of various sorts. Th
ese misunderstandings relegate an important explanatory variable to the soc
ial science scrap heap. Accordingly the author engages in three tasks. Firs
t, selected prominent arguments for culture's lack of explanatory usefulnes
s are discussed. Second, it is demonstrated how at least one conceptualizat
ion of culture, Mary Douglas and Aaron Wildavsky's grid-group theory, overc
omes aspects of these difficulties and contributes to explaining institutio
nal form and political change. Third, it is argued that grid-group theory c
ontributes significantly to both institutional analysis and rational choice
theory. Grid-group theory augments each of these latter two approaches hes
and, more important, reveals complementary aspects, linking these modes of
analysis together as mutually supportive elements of a more inclusive expl
anatory scheme.