Tympanic pressure gradients and otoacoustic emissions

Citation
Ks. Konradsson et al., Tympanic pressure gradients and otoacoustic emissions, EAR HEAR, 20(5), 1999, pp. 403-409
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology
Journal title
EAR AND HEARING
ISSN journal
01960202 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
403 - 409
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-0202(199910)20:5<403:TPGAOE>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effec ts of tympanic over- and under-pressure, induced by variations in ambient p ressure on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) in healthy individua ls. It was of particular interest to elucidate whether changes in the CEOAE response in both spectral and time domains could be attributed not only to tympanic, but also to cochlear influence. Design: Nine healthy subjects with normal hearing and middle ear pressure w ere exposed to ambient pressure changes in a pressure chamber. The pressure was progressively changed in 100 daPa steps to accomplish an increase and a decrease in tympanic pressure, Pressure equilibration of the middle ear w as avoided. The relative tympanic over- and under-pressure (+/- 320 daPa) w as monitored by tympanometry and the CEOAEs recorded at every step of tympa nic pressure change. Results: There was a statistically significant reduction of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) response levels and reproducibility already at 100 daPa of ambient pressure change. The OAE response was progressively reduced by incr eased pressure gradients. The CEOAEs recorded during progressive tympanic o ver- and under-pressure also had increasingly shorter latencies. These chan ges of the OAE response characteristics were most pronounced in the 750 to 3000 Hz frequency bands. Conclusions: The progressive attenuation of the OAE response and the concom itant shortening of the OAE response latencies were observed during a combi nation of altered middle and inner ear pressure. Although the middle and in ner ear influence cannot be separated we suggest, based on our findings, th at the shortening of latencies may partly be caused by inner ear pressure c hanges and stiffening of the labyrinthine membranes. Further studies are ne eded to more specifically clarify the relative contribution of the tympanic and labyrinthine influence, respectively, for the various aspects of press ure influence on the OAE response.