Jm. Plavcan et Cp. Vanschaik, INTRASEXUAL COMPETITION AND BODY-WEIGHT DIMORPHISM IN ANTHROPOID PRIMATES, American journal of physical anthropology, 103(1), 1997, pp. 37-67
Body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates has been thought to be a
consequence of sexual selection resulting from male-male competition
for access to mates. However, while monogamous anthropoids show low de
grees of weight dimorphism, as predicted by the sexual selection hypot
hesis, polygynous anthropoids show high variation in weight dimorphism
that is not associated with measures of mating system or sex ratio. T
his observation has led many to debate the role of other factors such
as dietary constraints, predation pressure, substrate constraints, all
ometric effects, and phylogeny in the evolution of anthropoid weight d
imorphism. Here, we re-evaluate variation in adult body weight dimorph
ism in anthropoids, testing the sexual selection hypothesis using cate
gorical estimates of the degree of male-male intrasexual competition (
''competition levels''). We also test the hypotheses that interspecifi
c variation in body weight dimorphism is associated with female body w
eight and categorical estimates of diet, substrate use, and phylogeny.
Weight dimorphism is strongly associated with competition levels, cor
roborating the sexual selection hypothesis. Weight dimorphism is posit
ively correlated with increasing female body weight, but evidence sugg
ests that the correlation reflects an interaction between overall size
and behavior, Arboreal species are, on average, less dimorphic than t
errestrial species, while more frugivorous species tend to be more dim
orphic than folivorous or insectivorous species. Several alternative h
ypotheses can explain these latter results. Weight dimorphism is corre
lated with taxonomy, but so too are competition levels. We suggest tha
t most taxonomic correlations of weight dimorphism represent ''phyloge
netic niche conservatism''; however, colobines show consistently low d
egrees of weight dimorphism for reasons that are not clear. (C) 1997 W
iley-Liss, Inc.