Complementary foraging behaviors allow coexistence of two consumers

Citation
Wg. Wilson et al., Complementary foraging behaviors allow coexistence of two consumers, ECOLOGY, 80(7), 1999, pp. 2358-2372
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00129658 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2358 - 2372
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-9658(199910)80:7<2358:CFBACO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
We developed a mathematical model based on the microalgal-gastropod system studied by Schmitt, in which two coexisting consumers (Tegula eisini and T. aureotincta) feed on a common resource. The two consumers differ in their foraging behavior and their ability to remove microalgae from rock surfaces . T. eisini is a digger, moving slowly and grazing the algae down to almost bare substrate, whereas T. aureotincta is a grazer, moving more quickly an d leaving behind a larger fraction of the algal layer. These complementary foraging strategies result in a size-structured algal resource, with each s ize class differentially accessible to each of the consumers. Our model rec ognized three accessibility states for an algal patch: a refuge (recently g razed by the digger and currently inaccessible to either consumer), a low l evel (exploitable only by the digger), and a high level (exploitable by bot h consumers). We assumed that all interactions between consumers and resour ces were linear and examined the relatively short time-scale dynamics of fe eding, algal renewal, and individual consumer growth at fixed densities of consumers. Thus, our model complemented related models that have focused on population dynamics rather than foraging behavior. The model revealed that coexistence of two consumers feeding on a single algal resource can be med iated by differences in the consumers' foraging modes and the resource stru cture that these behaviors create. We then estimated model parameters using data from Schmitt's experimental s tudies of Tegula. The fits to the experimental data were all very good, and the resulting parameter values placed the system very close to a narrow co existence region, demonstrating that foraging complementarity in this syste m facilitates coexistence. The foraging trade-offs observed here are likely to be common in many consumer-resource systems. Indeed, mechanisms similar to those we discuss have been suggested in many other systems in which sim ilar consumers also coexist. This model not only demonstrates that such an argument is theoretically plausible, but also provides the first applicatio n of the model, showing that the observed conditions for the Tegula system fall very close to the appropriate parameter space. Such quantitative tests are critical if we are to rigorously test the models developed to explain patterns of coexistence.