Using open-ended interviews to conduct research on foreign elites raises me
thodological questions which conducting research on non-foreign elites and
foreign non-elites does not. In this paper I first reflect upon some of the
practical issues I have encountered when conducting interviews with member
s of foreign elites: I then examine the issue of positionality to suggest t
hat the dualism of "insider" knowledge and status Versus "outsider" knowled
ge and status is not as stable as it is often assumed to be, and that it sh
ould not be presumed that an "insider" will necessarily produce "better" kn
owledge than will an "outsider" simply by dint of their positionality. Inde
ed, given that the interview process is about constructing social meaning -
a process that involves both the researcher and the source - in many ways
such a dualism is meaningless. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights re
served.