Spectrum of reperfusion strategies and factors influencing the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with the facilities to perform primary angioplasty

Citation
R. Zahn et al., Spectrum of reperfusion strategies and factors influencing the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with the facilities to perform primary angioplasty, HEART, 82(4), 1999, pp. 420-425
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
HEART
ISSN journal
13556037 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
420 - 425
Database
ISI
SICI code
1355-6037(199910)82:4<420:SORSAF>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Objective-To determine the frequency of the use of primary angioplasty in p atients with acute myocardial infarction and the factors influencing its in dications in hospitals with the facilities to perform this treatment. Design-Data from the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarct ion (MITRA) trial were analysed, concerning the effects of the decisions of individual hospitals, the time of admission of patients, and the effects o f patient characteristics on the selection of reperfusion treatment. Patients-Between June 1994 and January 1997 eight hospitals treated 1532 pa tients with acute myocardial infarction. 418 (27.3%) were treated conservat ively, 641 (41.8%) were treated using intravenous thrombolysis, 387 (25.3%) were treated using primary angioplasty, and 86 (5.6%) received a combinati on of thrombolysis and angioplasty. Results-The proportion of patients treated with primary angioplasty varied from 1.8% to 57.7% among the eight hospitals. The use of primary angioplast y during non-office hours also showed wide variation, ranging from 20% to 5 4% between centres. The use of thrombolysis was comparatively evenly distri buted during the non-office hours, ranging from 50-69%. Four hospitals with a primary angioplasty use rate > 30% showed no difference in the proportio n of patients with contraindications for thrombolysis, high risk patients, or a combination of both, when compared with four hospitals with a lower ra te of primary angioplasty use (98/322 (30.4%) upsilon 19/65 (29.2%), respec tively, p = 0.847). Conclusions-In hospitals with the facilities for performing primary angiopl asty the most important factors influencing its use were the discretion of the individual hospital and the time of patient admission. Characteristics of patients did not influence the choice of reperfusion treatment.