Na. Nabors et al., USE OF THE NEUROBEHAVIORAL COGNITIVE STATUS EXAMINATION (COGNISTAT) IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY, The journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 12(3), 1997, pp. 79-84
Objective: To examine the relationship between the Neurobehavioral Cog
nitive Status Examination (Cognistat) and established neuropsychologic
al measures of related constructs in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) sa
mple. Design: A retrospective study of 45 patients who were administer
ed Cognistat as part of a neuropsychological evaluation. Setting: A te
rtiary care rehabilitation center. Patients: Forty-five TBI patients a
dmitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit from January 1994 through
December 1995 and referred for a neuropsychological evaluation. Main O
utcome Measure: Cognistat, a neuropsychological screening measure, tha
t assesses orientation, attention, language, memory, calculation, cons
truction, and reasoning. Pearson zero-order correlations were calculat
ed between Cognistat subtests and selected standard neuropsychological
measures. It was hypothesized that Cognistat would be associated with
the standard neuropsychological measures. Results: The following Cogn
istat subtests were significantly associated with standard neuropsycho
logical measures: Cognistat Memory with the California Verbal Learning
Test and Logical Memory, Cognistat Comprehension with the Token Test,
Cognistat Construction with Block Design, and Cognistat Attention wit
h Trails A. No significant relationship was found between Cognistat re
asoning subtests and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Conclusion: Cons
istent with the hypotheses, Cognistat subtests were significantly asso
ciated with standard neuropsychological measures of related cognitive
constructs. These findings suggest that general statements regarding s
pecific domains of cognitive functioning can be made using Cognistat s
ubtest scores.