USE OF THE NEUROBEHAVIORAL COGNITIVE STATUS EXAMINATION (COGNISTAT) IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

Citation
Na. Nabors et al., USE OF THE NEUROBEHAVIORAL COGNITIVE STATUS EXAMINATION (COGNISTAT) IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY, The journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 12(3), 1997, pp. 79-84
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
ISSN journal
08859701
Volume
12
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
79 - 84
Database
ISI
SICI code
0885-9701(1997)12:3<79:UOTNCS>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Objective: To examine the relationship between the Neurobehavioral Cog nitive Status Examination (Cognistat) and established neuropsychologic al measures of related constructs in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) sa mple. Design: A retrospective study of 45 patients who were administer ed Cognistat as part of a neuropsychological evaluation. Setting: A te rtiary care rehabilitation center. Patients: Forty-five TBI patients a dmitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit from January 1994 through December 1995 and referred for a neuropsychological evaluation. Main O utcome Measure: Cognistat, a neuropsychological screening measure, tha t assesses orientation, attention, language, memory, calculation, cons truction, and reasoning. Pearson zero-order correlations were calculat ed between Cognistat subtests and selected standard neuropsychological measures. It was hypothesized that Cognistat would be associated with the standard neuropsychological measures. Results: The following Cogn istat subtests were significantly associated with standard neuropsycho logical measures: Cognistat Memory with the California Verbal Learning Test and Logical Memory, Cognistat Comprehension with the Token Test, Cognistat Construction with Block Design, and Cognistat Attention wit h Trails A. No significant relationship was found between Cognistat re asoning subtests and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Conclusion: Cons istent with the hypotheses, Cognistat subtests were significantly asso ciated with standard neuropsychological measures of related cognitive constructs. These findings suggest that general statements regarding s pecific domains of cognitive functioning can be made using Cognistat s ubtest scores.