This study sought to examine self-reported emotional and behavioral correla
tes of money pathology, defined as inappropriate behavior with respect to m
oney and associated material goods. In all, 267 British adult subjects comp
leted a battery of questionnaires including Rubinstein's (1981) extensive P
sychology Today survey on money and Forman's ipsative measures that describ
e five. Money Pathology Scales (miser, spendthrift, tycoon, bargain hunter,
gambler), an overall pathology scale combining the five and his short mone
ysanity measure:. The former measure was factor analyzed and selected facto
r scores regressed on to the moneysanity measure along with demographic mea
sures in order to al:tempt to establish which individual difference factors
best predicted the different: types of money pathology. Thus females were
more extravagant, prone to depression, but less likely to take moral risks
for money, while richer, more right-wing people tended to be more materiali
stic. Those with overall less "money sanity" tended more to believe luck an
d dishonesty were more important in making money; were self-denying and eco
nomically pessimistic, and had powerful negative emotions like anger and an
xiety around money. Multiple regressions on to the money types showed that
between 15 and 30% of the variance could be explained and accounted for, by
the selected independent variables (demographic, religious and political b
elief, illness, and more general attitudes toward wealth). Demographic vari
ables like age, and negative emotions about money were consistent predictor
s of money pathology. Results are discussed in terms of the small, but grow
ing literature on the psychology of money (Furnham, 1997; Furnham & Argyle,
1998).