M. Yamakage et al., Changes in respiratory pattern and arterial blood gases during sedation with propofol or midazolam in spinal anesthesia, J CLIN ANES, 11(5), 1999, pp. 375-379
Study Objectives: To investigate changes in respiratory pattern and arteria
l blood gases during sedation with, propofol or midazolam in spinal anesthe
sia.
Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Setting: Operating room of a university-affiliated hospital.
Patients: 40 ASA physical status I and II patients who required spinal anes
thesia.
Interventions: Spinal anesthesia with tetracaine and subsequent sedation wi
th propofol (n = 15), midazolam (n = 15), or placebo (n = 10) was performed
.
Measurements: Respiratory pattern [rib cage contribution to the tidal volum
e (%RC) and phase shift between rib cage and abdominal movements (PSrc-ab)]
with a respiratory inductive plethysmograph (Respigraph(TM)) and arterial
blood gas analysis (pH, pO(2), and pCO(2)) Were recorded.
Main Results: Spinal anesthesia per se increased %RC by 35% without changin
g PSrc-ab values (1.00). Sedation with propofol and midazolam decreased %RC
by 60% and by 40%, respectively. PSrc-ab increased in both groups followin
g sedation, and the increase in this parameter was higher in the propofol g
roup (1.12) than in the midazolam group (1.04). In the placebo group, %RC d
ecreased by 20% without ang change in PSrc-ab. The decrease in pO(2) was mo
re significant in the propofol group (65.1 mmHg) than in the midazolam (74.
2 mmHg) and placebo (83.1 mmHg) groups.
Conclusion: Significant decreases in %RC and pO(2) during propofol sedation
seem to depend on paradoxical respiration due, in part, to upper airway ob
struction; therefore, attention should be directed to the respiratory patte
rn during sedation, especially with propofol. (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science
Inc.