Changes in respiratory pattern and arterial blood gases during sedation with propofol or midazolam in spinal anesthesia

Citation
M. Yamakage et al., Changes in respiratory pattern and arterial blood gases during sedation with propofol or midazolam in spinal anesthesia, J CLIN ANES, 11(5), 1999, pp. 375-379
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
ISSN journal
09528180 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
375 - 379
Database
ISI
SICI code
0952-8180(199908)11:5<375:CIRPAA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Study Objectives: To investigate changes in respiratory pattern and arteria l blood gases during sedation with, propofol or midazolam in spinal anesthe sia. Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled study. Setting: Operating room of a university-affiliated hospital. Patients: 40 ASA physical status I and II patients who required spinal anes thesia. Interventions: Spinal anesthesia with tetracaine and subsequent sedation wi th propofol (n = 15), midazolam (n = 15), or placebo (n = 10) was performed . Measurements: Respiratory pattern [rib cage contribution to the tidal volum e (%RC) and phase shift between rib cage and abdominal movements (PSrc-ab)] with a respiratory inductive plethysmograph (Respigraph(TM)) and arterial blood gas analysis (pH, pO(2), and pCO(2)) Were recorded. Main Results: Spinal anesthesia per se increased %RC by 35% without changin g PSrc-ab values (1.00). Sedation with propofol and midazolam decreased %RC by 60% and by 40%, respectively. PSrc-ab increased in both groups followin g sedation, and the increase in this parameter was higher in the propofol g roup (1.12) than in the midazolam group (1.04). In the placebo group, %RC d ecreased by 20% without ang change in PSrc-ab. The decrease in pO(2) was mo re significant in the propofol group (65.1 mmHg) than in the midazolam (74. 2 mmHg) and placebo (83.1 mmHg) groups. Conclusion: Significant decreases in %RC and pO(2) during propofol sedation seem to depend on paradoxical respiration due, in part, to upper airway ob struction; therefore, attention should be directed to the respiratory patte rn during sedation, especially with propofol. (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc.