BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations in locally recurrent breast cancer patientsafter lumpectomy and radiation therapy: Implications for breast-conservingmanagement in patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations
Bc. Turner et al., BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations in locally recurrent breast cancer patientsafter lumpectomy and radiation therapy: Implications for breast-conservingmanagement in patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, J CL ONCOL, 17(10), 1999, pp. 3017-3024
Purpose: Breast cancer patients treated conservatively with lumpectomy and
radiation therapy (LRT) have an estimated lifetime risk of local relapse (i
psilateral breast tumor recurrence [IBTR]) of 10% to 15%. For breast cancer
patients carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations, the outcome of treat
ment with LRT with respect to IBTR has not been determined. In this study,
we estimate the frequency of BRCA1/2 mutations in a study of breast cancer
patients with IBTR treated with LRT.
Patients and Methods: Between 1973 and 1994, there were 52 breast cancer pa
tients treated with LRT who developed an IBTR within the prior irradiated b
reast and who were willing to participate in the cur rent study. From our d
atabase, we also identified 52 control breast cancer patients treated with
LRT without IBTR The control patients were individually matched to the inde
x cases with respect to multiple clinical and pathologic parameters. Lympho
cyte DNA specimens from all 52 locally recurrent patients and 15 of the mat
ched control patients under age 40 were used as templates for polymerase ch
ain reaction amplification and dye-primer sequencing of exons 2 to 24 of BR
CA1, exons 2 to 27 of BRCA2 and flanking intron sequences.
Results: After LRT, eight (15%) of 52 breast cancer patients had IBTR with
deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations. By age, there were six (40%) of 15 patients
with IBTR under age 40 with BRCA1/2 mutations, one (9.0%) of 11 between age
s 40 and 49, and one (3.8%) of 26 older than age 49. in comparison to the s
ix (40%) of 15 of patients under age 40 with IBTR found to have BRCA1/2 mut
ations, only one (6.6%) of 15 matched control patients without IBTR and had
a BRCA1/2 mutation (P = .03). The median time to IBTR for patients with BR
CA1/2 mutations was 7.8 years compared with 4.7 years for patients without
BRCA1/2 mutations (P = .03). By clinical and histologic criteria, these rel
apses represented second primary tumors developing in the conservatively tr
eated breast. All patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and IBTR underwent succes
sful surgical salvage mastectomy at the time of IBTR and remain alive with
out evidence of local or systemic progression of disease.
Conclusion: In this study we found an elevated frequency of deleterious BRC
A1/2 mutations in breast cancer patients treated with LRT who developed lat
e IBTR. The relatively long time to IBTR, as well as the histologic and cli
nical criteria, suggests that these recurrent cancers actually represent ne
w primary breast cancers. Early onset breast cancer patients experiencing I
BTR have a disproportionately high frequency of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutatio
ns. This information may be helpful in guiding management in BRCA1 or BRCA2
patients considering breast conserving therapy. (C) 1999 by American Socie
ty of Clinical Oncology.