Combination versus sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel as primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: A randomized pilot trial of the Hoosier Oncology Group
Kd. Miller et al., Combination versus sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel as primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: A randomized pilot trial of the Hoosier Oncology Group, J CL ONCOL, 17(10), 1999, pp. 3033-3037
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination and sequentia
l dose dense chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhone-P
oulenc Rorer Collegeville, PA) as primary chemotherapy of breast cancer.
Patients and Methods: patients with newly diagnosed stage II or noninflamma
tory stage III breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive the same tot
al doses of doxorubicin and docetaxel over a 12-week period before definiti
ve surgery. Patients in arm A received sequential therapy with doxorubicin
75 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks for three cycles followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m(2)
every 2 weeks for three cycles. Patients in arm B received combination the
rapy with doxorubicin 56 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks fo
r four cycles. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered on da
ys 2 to 12 of each cycle in both groups.
Results: Forty patients were entered onto the trial. Pretreatment tumor siz
e averaged 5.7 cm with clinically positive axillary lymph nodes in 23 patie
nts (57%). As expected, myelosuppression was severe in both groups; however
, greater than or equal to 80% of planned dose-intensity was delivered. Han
d-foot syndrome was more common after sequential therapy. Clinical response
s were similar in bath groups, with an overall response rate of 87%, includ
ing 20% clinical complete remissions. Pathologic complete remission or resi
dual in situ disease only was confirmed in five patients (12.8%). patients
who received sequential therapy had fewer positive lymph nodes (mean, 2.17
v 4.81: P < .037) at definitive surgery.
Conclusion: Primary chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel is well tol
erated and highly active. A sequential treatment schedule increases toxicit
y but may result in more substantial lymph node clearance than combination
therapy. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.