The time-course for the development of ultraviolet A-induced erythema in ps
oralen-sensitized skin differs from that caused by ultraviolet B or ultravi
olet A but objective data are not available. During psoralen ultraviolet A
therapy, the minimal phototoxic dose is determined 72 h after exposure, whe
n psoralen ultraviolet A erythema is assumed to be maximal. This measuremen
t is of fundamental importance in optimizing the therapeutic regimen, We ex
amined a detailed time-course for development of psoralen ultraviolet A ery
thema in 16 subjects. The erythemal responses to ultraviolet B, ultraviolet
A and psoralen ultraviolet A were assessed visually and using a reflectanc
e device, Ultraviolet B erythema was maximal 24 h after exposure compared w
ith subsequent time-points. Psoralen ultraviolet A erythema was evident at
24 h, with reduction in the median ultraviolet A minimal erythema dose from
14 to 5 J per cm(2) in the presence of psoralen (p < 0.01; n = 9), Peak ps
oralen ultraviolet A erythema, assessed by minimal phototoxic dose, did not
occur until 96 h or later in 75% of subjects. Using individual dose-respon
se curves, we determined that only 67% of mean maximum psoralen ultraviolet
A erythemal intensity had developed by 72 h, Furthermore, at the time of m
aximal erythema, the slope of the psoralen ultraviolet A dose-response curv
e was approximately 2-fold shallower than that for ultraviolet B-induced er
ythema. If assessment of psoralen ultraviolet A erythemal sensitivity had b
een made at 96 h instead of the conventional 72 h time-point, peak erythema
l responses would not have been missed in any of the subjects. Based on the
se findings, it seems appropriate to consider whether psoralen ultraviolet
A minimal phototoxic dose measurements should be performed 96 h after expos
ure.