Automatic detection of bursts in spike trains recorded from the thalamus of a monkey performing wrist movements

Citation
Zm. Xu et al., Automatic detection of bursts in spike trains recorded from the thalamus of a monkey performing wrist movements, J NEUROSC M, 91(1-2), 1999, pp. 123-133
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
ISSN journal
01650270 → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
123 - 133
Database
ISI
SICI code
0165-0270(19990915)91:1-2<123:ADOBIS>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
In a previous paper (Churchward PR, Butler EG, Finkelstein DI, Aumann TD, S udbury A, Horne MK. J Neurosci Methods 1997;76:203-210), we showed that a s imple back propagation neural network could reliably model visual inspectio n by human observers in detecting the point of change of neuronal discharge patterns. The data for that study was deliberately chosen so that the poin t of change was readily detected and there would be high concordance betwee n human observers. We wished to extend this investigation by comparing a va riety of automatic analysis methods on more complex data sets. Two automati c analysis methods have been discussed in this paper. The knowledge based s pike train analysis (KBSTA) was designed to emulate the detection of bursts by human observers. The self-organizing feature map (SOFM) spike train ana lysis determined a burst by classifying the patterns of neuronal discharge. Neuronal discharge was recorded from the motor thalamus and nucleus ventra lis posterior lateralis caudalis (VPLc) of a monkey performing consecutive trials of skilled wrist movements. Recordings were made from 36 neurons who se discharge patterns were related to wrist movement. Three hundred and six ty trials performed during the recording of these 36 neurons were chosen at random and used to compare the three methods, KBSTA, SOFM, and visual insp ection. The main results of this study show that for the 360 trials the thr ee detection methods have very similar results in detecting the onset and o ffset of neuronal bursts. The SOFM method is not the best first approach fo r detecting a burst, but it does provides independent evidence to support t he KBSTA and visual inspection methods. In conclusion we propose the KBSTA method as a practical, automatic technique to identify bursts of neuronal d ischarge. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.