When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation

Citation
J. Glaser et Mr. Banaji, When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation, J PERS SOC, 77(4), 1999, pp. 669-687
Citations number
69
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00223514 → ACNP
Volume
77
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
669 - 687
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3514(199910)77:4<669:WFIFAF>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Responses to information were facilitated by the rapid prior presentation o f evaluatively congruent material. This fundamental discovery (R. H. Fazio, D. M. Sanbonmatsu, M. C. Powell, & F. R. Kardes, 1986) marked a breakthrou gh in research on automatic information processing by demonstrating that ev aluative meaning is grasped without conscious control. Experiments employin g a word naming task provided stringent tests of the automaticity of evalua tion and found support for it. More strikingly, a previously unobserved rev ersal of these effects (i.e., slower responses to evaluatively matched rath er than mismatched items) was found when primes were evaluatively extreme. Procedural variances across 6 experiments revealed that the reverse priming effect was highly robust. This discovery is analogous to demonstrations of contrast effects in controlled judgments. It is theorized that the reverse priming effect reflects an automatic correction for the biasing influence of the prime.