Dyskinesias are most prevalent in patients with Huntington's disease (HD),
patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have received chronic levodopa t
herapy, and in patients who have been treated with neuroleptics (tardive dy
skinesia [TD]). Recent therapeutic developments have fueled a growing inter
est in the clinimetrics of dyskinesias. For dyskinesias in HD, few rating s
cales are available, but data on validity, reliability, and responsiveness
are scarce. Only the interrater reliability of facial dyskinesias has been
evaluated and found to be low. Many subjective rating scales for dyskinesia
s in PD exist, but only the Dyskinesia Rating Scale has undergone sufficien
t clinimetric evaluation. For TD, numerous rating scales are available, man
y of them with ample data on reliability and validity. Objective assessment
of dyskinesias has been attempted with a number of techniques. All these m
ethods require a laboratory setting, rendering them susceptible to influenc
e of stress. Moreover, they provide only a momentary assessment of dyskines
ia severity and fail to take into account diurnal fluctuations. In view of
the methodologic shortcomings in the assessment of dyskinesias, more effort
needs to be put into strengthening currently available modes of assessment
or designing new ones. In the future ambulatory accelerometry might prove
to be of value in this field.