Midthoracic catheter tip placement for intrathecal baclofen administrationin children with quadriparetic spasticity

Citation
Pa. Grabb et al., Midthoracic catheter tip placement for intrathecal baclofen administrationin children with quadriparetic spasticity, NEUROSURGER, 45(4), 1999, pp. 833-836
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
NEUROSURGERY
ISSN journal
0148396X → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
833 - 836
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-396X(199910)45:4<833:MCTPFI>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In an effort to increase the effect of intrathecal baclofen on u pper-extremity spasticity, the tip of the intrathecal catheter was placed a t the T6-T7 level rather than at the traditional T11-T12 level in children with spastic quadriparesis. METHODS: Twelve children with spastic quadriparesis from varying causes had significant reductions in spasticity after a test dose of intrathecal bacl ofen and subsequently underwent placement of a programmable pump and intrat hecal catheter tip placed at the T6-T7 level with fluoroscopic guidance. Wi th the use of Ashworth scores for four muscle groups in both the upper and lower extremities, degrees of spasticity were determined by a physiatrist p reoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Mean changes i n upper- and lower-extremity Ashworth scores and baclofen dosages for the e ntire cohort were compared with published results in which the catheter tip had been placed at the T11-T12 level. RESULTS: Spasticity was significantly reduced in all muscle groups (P < 0.0 01). The lower-extremity reduction in spasticity of 1.6 points at 3 and 12 months was greater than published reductions of 1.1 points at 3 and 12 mont hs. The upper-extremity reduction in spasticity was noticeably greater at 3 and 12 months (1.7 and 2.0 points, respectively) than published results at 3 and 12 months (0.4 and 0.6 points, respectively). At 3, 6, and 12 months , our mean baclofen dosage remained below the dosages administered at the T 11-T12 level. There were no complications related either to the positioning of the catheter higher in the spinal canal or to the administration of bac lofen at the T6-T7 level. CONCLUSION: Compared with published results, placement of the tip of the in trathecal catheter at the T6-T7 level was associated with greater relief of upper-extremity spasticity without loss of effect on the lower extremities . The mean dosages of baclofen in our study group were lower compared with mean dosages administered at the T11-T12 level. There was no morbidity rela ted to the more rostral location of the catheter.