Simulated 3-dimensional (3-D) representation of computerized data is a valu
able diagnostic tool in evaluation of tumors of the central nervous system.
Several reports exist regarding the clinical value of 3-D imaging, but the
re is little objective evidence to quantify improved performance from the i
mages. The purpose of this study was to quantify the efficacy of simulated
3-D versus 2-D image interpretation in a nonclinical model. A 3-tiered, 3-D
model was constructed, and objects were placed in varied positions. CT was
then performed on each of the models. Fifty-three subjects were shown the
CT images and asked to reconstruct the model as depicted by either 2-D or s
imulated 3-D images. Performance between subject groups was different depen
ding on clinical experience. In addition, it was found that the 3-D represe
ntation of data allowed for a significantly faster performance of the task
of image interpretation and reconstruction of the model.